Trivia sounds like a crazy person having a meltdown:
"the interesting part is: the dog walker isn't mentioned anywhere in the post. i read about a lady gaga "dog theft" being possibly "politically motivated" and leave the most obvious comment possible: lady gaga politics are extremely shit and i hope the dogs are OK.
for booksforlunch to be concerned i didn't offer my sympathies for a dog-walker in a post that doesn't mention the dog walker EVEN ONCE makes it clear.... this isn't about the dog-walker. it's about their own petty and irrational distaste for me mentioning how bullshit Gaga politics are.
what's interesting and what we'd like booksforlunch and all those who liked their comment to answer (plenty of those who cosplay as progressives) is: criticizing the political views of a celebrity on a post about a "politically motivated" crime would be considered ""on brand" zingers" and "politically fueled wank session" if said celebrity was a Trump supporter? we all know it wouldn't, right? but suddenly, war crimes and kids in cage have a whole other weight when it's Lady Gaga and the politicians she supports. the lowest part was trying to pretend as if their whole distaste is about the dog-walker, who is being opportunistically used by them to make some stupid point that doesn't even make sense (again, I never commented on any Gaga dognapping post, wasn't aware of the details and the dog walker ISN'T MENTIONED lol).
they honestly think this shit will fly, right? they think I am stupid? like using a heavily-wounded dog walker in an opportunistic and highly hypocritical way gives them literally no moral high ground. the lack of self-awareness is fascinating."
every ontd user was supporting biden's win once he was the only choice against trump and popping champagne they were so relieved when he was elected. why are they now liking trivia's wackjob comments calling him a rapist that are solely meant to cause political drama when a man was shot and could have died and someone's dogs were stolen? Fuck trivia
Also just...get a fucking life, Jesus H. Christ. Anyone who spends this much energy constantly making comments like this, looking for a fight in every single fucking post, has to be an absolutely MISERABLE person.
She real mad, I was suprised to see her randomly calling out users like spoil, zoaster_toaster, and H_H by name! She's mad cause they had the moral sympathy for the dog-walker instead of taking shots at Gaga.
Also the politically-motivated aspect is an ASSUMPTION for now so if it turns out that that was not the motive......her and all those users who liked her comment end up looking real bad!
i like how she mocked h_h for being a "progressive" because she ... had sympathy for the dog walker who almost died? and that spoil & zoaster must be liberal for caring about the man who almost died? a rational person who have just said, "oh wow, i had no idea someone was actually shot, my bad" and left it there. assuming, of course, she isn't lying about not knowing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 03:56 am (UTC)(link)"the interesting part is: the dog walker isn't mentioned anywhere in the post. i read about a lady gaga "dog theft" being possibly "politically motivated" and leave the most obvious comment possible: lady gaga politics are extremely shit and i hope the dogs are OK.
for booksforlunch to be concerned i didn't offer my sympathies for a dog-walker in a post that doesn't mention the dog walker EVEN ONCE makes it clear.... this isn't about the dog-walker. it's about their own petty and irrational distaste for me mentioning how bullshit Gaga politics are.
what's interesting and what we'd like booksforlunch and all those who liked their comment to answer (plenty of those who cosplay as progressives) is: criticizing the political views of a celebrity on a post about a "politically motivated" crime would be considered ""on brand" zingers" and "politically fueled wank session" if said celebrity was a Trump supporter? we all know it wouldn't, right? but suddenly, war crimes and kids in cage have a whole other weight when it's Lady Gaga and the politicians she supports. the lowest part was trying to pretend as if their whole distaste is about the dog-walker, who is being opportunistically used by them to make some stupid point that doesn't even make sense (again, I never commented on any Gaga dognapping post, wasn't aware of the details and the dog walker ISN'T MENTIONED lol).
they honestly think this shit will fly, right? they think I am stupid? like using a heavily-wounded dog walker in an opportunistic and highly hypocritical way gives them literally no moral high ground. the lack of self-awareness is fascinating."
https://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/120183604.html?thread=20119053364#t20119053364
every ontd user was supporting biden's win once he was the only choice against trump and popping champagne they were so relieved when he was elected. why are they now liking trivia's wackjob comments calling him a rapist that are solely meant to cause political drama when a man was shot and could have died and someone's dogs were stolen? Fuck trivia
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 03:57 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 03:59 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 03:59 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 04:03 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 04:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 04:05 am (UTC)(link)Also the politically-motivated aspect is an ASSUMPTION for now so if it turns out that that was not the motive......her and all those users who liked her comment end up looking real bad!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 04:15 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 04:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-02-27 04:21 am (UTC)(link)Her and the like are showing their true colors.